These recovery residences are commonly known as sober homes and are most often found in single-family residences. Oversight of residents is peer-based within the home; residents are self-monitoring and accountable to each other. The primary criterion for this living environment is a willingness to be abstinent from mood-altering substances. Self-help (e.g., 12-step) meetings and outside recovery support services are encouraged or required. Weekly house meetings are a standard component, where chores and overall house functioning are processed within the community.
“Buyer beware”: Treatment admissions practices and costs of residential treatment for opioid use disorder
This study examined the relationship between recovery residence characteristics (organizational, operational, and programming characteristics) and recovery outcomes (substance use, criminal justice, and employment outcomes) in 330 recovery residents. Participants were assessed upon entry to 1 of 49 recovery residences, specifically sober living houses located in California, and completed follow-up interviews 6 and 12 months later. All sober living houses were part of the Sober Living Network, a non-profit organization https://ecosoberhouse.com/ that implements housing standards for recovery residences across the United States. A quarter of the houses were affiliated with a treatment program and 69% of the houses were single-gender facilities. Chris Edrington, as Vice President of NARR, has made significant contributions to the sobriety and recovery residence landscape. He founded St. Paul Sober Living and worked to create supportive recovery environments in Minnesota and Colorado, resulting in policy advancements within the industry.
Novel harm-reduction approach to alcohol treatment shows promise among individuals experiencing homelessness
In this study, the panel members leveraged their expertise in recovery residence research and policy to develop a research agenda for the immediate future, while making relevant recommendations to policy makers, clinical program staff, and interested lay individuals. Recovery residences provide a recovery-focused home environment free of illicit drug and alcohol use. Individuals participating in community-based Medication-Assisted-Treatment (MAT) are welcomed by RRA members and encouraged by the Recovery Residence Association to utilize our housing directory to find a home that best meets their housing needs. The specific number of treatment days covered, in- versus out-of-network costs, and coverage for specific interventions often vary per insurance plan. To find out how much of the cost of sober living housing your health insurance will cover, it is best to call your insurance company before committing to a sober living home.
The REACH Initiative: Offering a Helping Hand to West Virginians in Recovery
Dr. Ashley E. Stewart stands at the forefront of diversity, inclusion, and social work, focusing her research on identity, structural oppression, and recovery health equity. Her work as an educator and consultant is pivotal in advancing policies that address health disparities and support recovery from substance use disorders. At Temple University’s School of Social Work, Dr. Stewart’s role further enables her to impact the next generation of social work professionals.
- Oxford Houses are governed by a charter and rules that are agreed upon at the outset, but those are kept to a minimum and decisions are made democratically.
- As the Founder and CEO of Hope Recovery Resources, Beth Fisher Sanders has dedicated her career to creating supportive environments for recovery.
- These recovery residences are commonly known as sober homes and are most often found in single-family residences.
- It is important to recognize that these data do not speak to the causality of observed relationships.
- This level is appropriate for the individual who needs a higher degree of structure and support, perhaps coming out of a stabilizing residential treatment center.
Her leadership at The Woodrow Project, focusing on women’s recovery, emphasizes the power of community and hope. We envision all persons in recovery from addiction having access to the recovery support they need to live happier, healthier lives. We believe everyone should have a safe, supportive and nurturing home environment in early recovery.
Faith-Based Recovery Support
As president of NARR, Darrell Mitchell exemplifies transformative leadership within the recovery residence sector. He has played a significant role in advancing recovery housing standards both statewide and nationally as the founder of the Indiana Affiliation of Recovery Residences (INARR). A pivotal advocate for legislative progress, Darrell was instrumental in embedding Recovery Housing standards into Indiana law in 2017—a landmark achievement in the advocacy for recovery residences. Darrell’s educational background from Purdue University and advanced degrees in Addictions Counseling and Business Administration from Indiana Wesleyan University underpin his comprehensive approach to leadership within the recovery community. Darrell’s involvement in various boards and councils further reflects his dedication to enhancing recovery support frameworks.
With a focus on addiction recovery since 1987 and a pivotal role in establishing and leading NARR as the founding president, Beth’s expertise and passion have significantly influenced the development of recovery residences. Her work as a frequent contributor to professional publications and public speaking engagements underscores her commitment to the transformative power of community in recovery. Fred’s visionary leadership within NARR and his contributions to the field have significantly advanced the quality and effectiveness of recovery residences, ensuring safe and supportive environments for those on their recovery journey. His personal and professional dedication to fostering change has established him as a leading figure in the recovery community. While Level 4 homes are included in “recovery residences” they wouldn’t typically be considered “sober living homes” since they fall into the category of inpatient treatment, rather than aftercare. TCs are a structured, clinical environment and are usually full-service, meaning that residents don’t have to go offsite for treatment.
Building Quality Recovery Housing
Like level 1, this setting often proves to be quite cost-effective; the length of stay varies and is open-ended. At level 2 some degree of ‘programming’ is offered in-house and often in collaboration what is a recovery residence with outside service providers such as outpatient programs. Level 2 residences are characterized by a community-based environment supervised by a senior resident, house manager, or staff member.
- Canada has a long and proud history of welcoming newcomers from around the world who support our economy and enrich our country.
- By living together, sharing experiences, difficulties, and accomplishments, and participating in communal activities, residents can build a strong support system that will assist them in long-term recovery.
- Established to set and maintain high standards for recovery residences, NARR’s goals include ensuring that individuals in recovery have access to safe and recovery-focused living environments that support their journey towards long-term recovery.
- These data were collected as part of a larger randomized controlled trial looking at the effectiveness of brief motivational interviewing and case management on service use and recovery progress.
- In establishing these definitions, NARR pursued an inclusive approach, gathering input from leading regional and national recovery housing groups, as well as individual recovery residence providers with decades of specialized experience.
NARR Leadership
We partner with state agencies and recovery community organizations to advocate for the adoption of our high-quality housing standards at both state and national levels. The NARR model lays the groundwork for recovery housing policies, practices, and services, offering those in recovery the chance for a sustainable and fulfilling life. This policy statement by the Society for Community Research and Action highlights what we know about recovery residences, and, just as importantly, what we need to know. The establishment of standards by the National Alliance of Recovery Residences, and the related push by some policy makers to adapt these standards to support recovery residences in their states are both noteworthy. In addition, the panel’s recommendation to evaluate recovery residences in context of other recovery support services was particularly compelling.